Perpetual Pix4D Mapper license not perpetual?

I post this here as the direct contact form with Pix4D constantly produces a Captcha error. Hopefully someone from Pix4D will read it.
We are a conservation NGO that received a generous one time donation to purchase a Pix4D Mapper perpetual license through DeltaQuad (attached), so we would not need to further invest in processing software. We use the software to monitor our 3400 ha reserve in the Middle Magdalena Valley of Colombia using a Deltaquad that was also generously donated. At some point, the software stopped allowing updates and now we received an email saying “If you continue to work with version 4.9.0 or older from the end of July, PIX4Dmapper will display a grey area instead of a basemap. To avoid this, please update your software”. We are very confused because we assumed that a 3.500 EUR perpetual license was supposed to be perpetual. However, not only we cannot upgrade anymore but neither use the software we had paid to use perpetually. The problem is that we need to explain that to our donors (that the perpetual license they donated for was not actually perpetual) and to raise further 1.200 USD every year which, for a small NGO like us, is hardly an option.
In that sense we wonder if 1) Pix4D assigned a non-perpetual license to our perpetual license by mistake or 2) Pix4D sold us a perpetual license that was not perpetual. If 2) is the case, we wonder if you have a non-profit program that could allow us to continue using the software for our conservation purposes, as that would imply not being able to use the software anymore. We appreciate you time and consideration on this matter.
Thank you very much and best regards,

2 Likes

Hi @fundacionbiodiversa,

Welcome to the Pix4D Community.

I’m sorry to hear that you at unable to submit a form for our sales team.
I will inform them, and they will reach out to you soon.

Thank you for understanding.

Regarding the basemap and PIX4Dmapper, the basemap is (was) provided by an external company and it has been decided to change the supplier. This has no impact on photogrammetry processing and results delivery.
The visual user experience will be lower and some operations may be harder to conduct.

You can find more information here:

Kind regards,
Daniele

It definitely feels like a “gotcha” to me. To ask perpetual license owners to upgrade their support & upgrades for pix4d mapper for $1,305.00 for a feature they had, but was REMOVED seems wrong. I understand the basemap supplier changed, but to your users this was a standard feature they didn’t know could be taken away from their perpetual license and then call it an “upgrade” to get it back.

Meanwhile, all pix4d users have been told from sales and support staff for the past few years is that resources will not be invested in mapper anymore for any new feature requests or improvements and to consider switching to Matic. I am definitely am not impressed with this Pix4D for this.

1 Like

Hi @craig ,

Thank you for your message.
I understand your point of view and situation.
Please also understand that keep backward compatibility of older versions is challenging and, as in this case, not always possible.

Please get in touch with us and explain your situation:

Kind regards,
Daniele

Despite the change in the supplier of the basemap I think this is a lack of respect for your costumers. I purchased a PERPETUAL license for nearly 5000 Euros, and know you remove a feature that I had from the start (?) And to have it again I have to pay for an upgrade? This doesn’t make any sense! I’m very disappointed by this service, this shouldn’t be happening.
I really hope you guys can take this into consideration, because I think like me there lot’s of more costumers who are unhappy with this.

Hi @fmffernandes23,

Welcome to the Pix4D Community :handshake:.

I understand your concerns and it might look like it doesn’t make any sense. Please understand that we have no control on external dependencies on older software versions.

Please get in touch with us and explain your situation:

Thank you for understanding.

Kind regards,
Daniele

I understand that you have no control over external dependencies, but that’s not the point here. The point is that you are taking away a service we purchased under a perpetual license deal, and now we are being asked to pay again to get it back.
There should be a free update so that users don’t lose this tool. It makes no sense to charge extra money for something we had already purchased. I’ve never seen this happen with any other software, and I think the reason why is quite obvious.

@fmffernandes23, please contact us here: Talk to sales

I contacted sales 2 or 3 days after this, and I haven’t got an answer.

Hi @fmffernandes23,

Thank you for bringing this to my attention.

I contacted my colleagues directly, and they assured me that they would provide an answer by tomorrow.

Thank you for understanding.

Daniele

Thanks Daniele, they have already reached out.

Best Regards,
Francisco

1 Like

Hi fmffernandes23, what did they reply? I’m in the same situation as you.

I’m in the same boat. It pisses me off what they did. This is something that should have been handled differently.

It seems that some people who were tha first adapters and helped your company grow and develop new sw, now we have pix4dmapper which is becoming an outdated product, even we paid for perpetual licence . Unfortunately even the new releases have only bugs and new cameras without any new feature.