I am trying to reconstruct 3D point cloud from images captured via 2D multispectral RedEdge-M. It generates separate images per band, 5 bands in total.
Importing the images worked great. Pix4d seemed to process the images correctly.
The following 2 pictures show some results:
I configured the following settings regarding point cloud reconstruction. Basically, I wanted to have the best possible result. Processing time was not an issue.
I have a few questions:
1.) I am particularly interested in the best possible reconstruction of the electrical towers. On the first 2 images you can see two of them. Taking this into consideration, did I configure Pix4d correctly or is there some configuration to get a better result.
2.) Why is the resulting point cloud grayscale? I expected it to be colored, since all relevant color information is contained in the 5 bands.
Just for comparison. The same UAV which captured the multispectral images was also equipped with a Sony UMC-R10C taking RGB images (much better resolution). I uploaded them to Pix4d cloud and got the following result:
Is a similar result in terms of texture possible with Pix4d Mapper too?
Pix4Dmapper desktop and Pix4Dmapper cloud will produce the same results. I will now answer to your specific questions:
1.) I am particularly interested in the best possible reconstruction of the electrical towers. On the first 2 images, you can see two of them. Taking this into consideration, did I configure Pix4d correctly or is there some configuration to get a better result.
2.) Why is the resulting point cloud grayscale? I expected it to be colored since all relevant color information is contained in the 5 bands.
The point cloud is generated separately for each band. You have generated the point cloud of the green band which is the default option (the rig is set to optimize relative rotation with a subset of secondaries with the reference camera as 1 which is the green band). If you go to image properties editor and change the processing mode in rig to optimize relative rotation, the point cloud of all bands will be generated but it will still be grayscale (but 5 point cloud models). You can read about rigs here: https://support.pix4d.com/hc/en-us/articles/115005852003-Processing-camera-rigs
Just for comparison. The same UAV which captured the multispectral images was also equipped with a Sony UMC-R10C taking RGB images (much better resolution). I uploaded them to Pix4d cloud and got the following result.
Since RGB images have better resolution, the point cloud generated will be better and will also have the color information (will be RGB) but for multispectral images, the pointcloud will be grayscale.
> Pix4Dmapper desktop and Pix4Dmapper cloud will produce the same results.
Regarding Multispektral Images: Pix4Dmapper desktop results are much better than Pix4Dmapper cloud results. Probably Pix4Dmapper cloud processing in different mode (faster, less quaility) than my local Pix4Dmapper desktop run.
Regarding RGB Images: Pix4Dmapper cloud much better (last image i posted in initial post by Pix4Dmapper cloud).
1.) Changed minimum number of matches to 3. Yes, it reduces noise, but it doesn’t improve reconstruction quality of the electrical towers (gray objects you see on the field). Actually, noise is not a big issue.
2.) I changed processing mode in rig to optimize relative rotation. Resulting quality is more or less the same.
2.) I changed processing mode in rig to optimize relative rotation. The resulting quality is more or less the same.
This will not change the quality of the output map so much. This option is mostly used for multispectral cameras not in our database… This is only when you want the point cloud of all bands.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems.
They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences,
logging in, or filling in forms. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.
They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site.
All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous.
If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partner (Google).
They may be used by Google to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites.
They do not directly store personal information but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device.
If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.