When I creat 3D Mesh after the Step 2 (by the comand “Generate 3D Textured Mesh”) the model is created , but with the bad visual quality. But I see that the point cloud is good.
At the Settings I selected “Hight resolution” parameter.
Please share with us some screenshots (of the Point Cloud and the Mesh) that highlight the problem.
Please also share screenshots of the quality report of your project. It will help us to better understand the case
My point cloud is not so bad, I can say that it is good.
The problem is that Mesh model doesn’t match to the points cloud. And on the name of the 3D Mesh model was added the word “simplified”. I want to know why?
This "simplified" is simply a naming scheme for usage inside the software: it does not mean your mesh is of lower quality.
The point cloud is quite noisy. I would recommend you to remove the noise from the point cloud (especially at the edges of the buildings), save the project and regenerate the 3D Mesh: On the Menu bar, click Process > Generate 3D Textured Mesh
Yesterday, after several striving (trying) the software could cread 3D Mesh model and I got it.
But the result is not so good.And therefore, orthophotomosaic also not so goot, I understand that my surveying was not so good but I have got better result in Bentley ContextCapture that Pix4Dmapper. I like the Pix4Dmapper very much, but the result disappoints me a little.
I have attached the report and screenshot of the 3D Mesh by two softwares.
The 3D textured mesh is generated based on the point cloud. All the points of the densified point cloud are used for the generation of the mesh. Therefore, any errors in the 3D points are reflected on the 3D mesh. Thus, the first step for assessing the quality of your outputs is to click on random points in the point cloud and check their reprojection on the images.
To do so, simply hover the mouse above the point cloud and click at a random point. Then, on the right side bar you will see how this point is reprojected on the images. If the reprojection is incorrect, you may mark more GCPs in that area or add MTPs and reoptimize the project.
Are they correctly reprojected on the images?
I assume that the two software (Pix4D Desktop and Bentley ContextCapture) are using a different point cloud for the mesh generation. I am not familiar with ContextCapture software, so I cannot assess the quality of this output.
I can though provide some recommendations for improving the results:
Increase the maximum number of triangles of the 3D textured mesh. This will help to render the finer details in the model.
Select High Resolution , so that the parameters values yielding a high resolution mesh are selected. Process > Processing Options > 2. Point Cloud and Mesh > 3D Textured Mesh tab > Settings > High Resolution.
Select Custom. Process > Processing Options > 2. Point Cloud and Mesh > 3D Textured Mesh tab > Settings > Custom.
In Decimation Criteria, select Quantitative.
In Maximum Number of Triangles, introduce a higher value. I suggest starting with a value 10 times higher, i.e. 10000000.
If it does not help, you could try improving the quality of the point cloud:
Adjust the parameters of the point cloud densification, to get denser point cloud Process > Processing Options > 2. Point Cloud and Mesh > Point Cloud tab _> Point Cloud Densification > s_et the Minimum Number of Matches to 5.
Draw surfaces that will be used in the generation of DSM and 3D Textured Mesh.
Remove the noise from the point cloud using the Point Cloud Editor before generating 3D models of your data set (3D Textured Mesh, DSM/DTM).
For more information about how to remove noise from the point cloud, you can take a look here: https://support.pix4d.com/hc/en-us/articles/204085149.
I hope this helps to improve the quality of the 3D textured mesh.
Regards,
We - and our partners - use cookies to deliver our services. By using our website, you agree to the use of cookies as described in our
Cookie Policy
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems.
They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences,
logging in, or filling in forms. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.
They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site.
All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous.
If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partner (Google).
They may be used by Google to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites.
They do not directly store personal information but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device.
If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.