Hi, I have been exploring Pix4Dmatic as an alternative to Pix4Dmapper when it comes to getting corrections from a Real Time Network (RTN) on our RTK enabled drone. We connected the drone to the RTN and collected the images. Once the mission was completed we then connected our Trimble R10 rover to the same RTN to tie a handful of targets. Within Pix4Dmatic I specified the datum information and completed the initial calibration of the collected images. When I bring in the tied targets and mark them within the images as check points the horizontal error from the calibrated position to the surveyed position has showed great result being approximately 0.1’. My problem is when it comes to the vertical. Vertically I am seeing approximately 2.5’ from the computed position to the surveyed position. I can confirm it is not a rod bust. I am not sure where this vertical shift is coming from. My goal is to obtain the best results possible without constraining to the collected targets for the vertical difference. Hopefully someone has an explanation and solution?
Hi jlitts,
Can you confirm what coordinate system your RTN is correcting on? Is it NAD83 (2011)? In addition, can you confirm what vertical coordinate system your RTK drone is using. Is it the GRS80 ellipsoid, EGM96, etc. And then are you entering that information as the image coordinate system?
We have the same issue. We are a surveying firm and own the Mavic 3 enterpise with RTK module. Using a Custom Network NTRIP RTK on the drone should bring the data in at 93m in Pix4d matic after calibrations without the need for GCPs. But this comes out almost 50m off. We are using the pix4d coordinate system of OSGB36 - ODN Height - geoid OSGM15 .
Any reason why this is happening ?
It sounds like there is a mismatch somewhere in the coordinate reference systems selected, most specifically the vertical reference.
Can you please describe the workflow you are following especially as it relates to Coordinate reference systems. They all need to coordinate, inconsistencies can add errors such as these.
What reference is used for this custom NTRIP network
Can you confirm what vertical coordinate system your RTK drone is using, and the images are tagged with?
You are selecting OSGB36 - ODN Height - geoid OSGM15 for the project in PIX4Dmatic. Is it safe to assume you are using EPSG:7405 with the OSGM15 geoid?
Hi, I’m having the exact same problem. I do not seem to have EPSG:7405 as an option for either the coordinate reference or the vertical height reference.
If i have been connected to the Trimble VRS network (rtcm3 corections) and am looking for OSGB output what coordinate reference options should I be using?
Thanks
Tim
As my colleague Mike mentioned in a post above, can you please confirm that the horizontal and vertical coordinate systems for the images are set correctly and reflect the coordinate system used by your RTK drone to fill in the geotags?
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems.
They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences,
logging in, or filling in forms. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.
They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site.
All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous.
If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partner (Google).
They may be used by Google to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites.
They do not directly store personal information but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device.
If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.