Hello, I’ve spent many hours understanding how to use the Pix4d desktop software.
Thousands of pictures, learning best shooting method, then tuning the project.
I tried 3 different projects: a statue and my drone, the inside of my kitchen, and the outside of my house.
As my best results were of poor quality, I had a close look to demos such as Chillon Castle :
This Chillon project is also of poor quality, just good for a draft project.
Same poor quality with the statue of Rio de Janeiro https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ucLIckILT4
This one is a bit better, but have a look to all artefacts on arms for example or all visible black holes !
So probably The method used (pictures to 3D ) cannot lead to good results.
I really know how to use the 3D Blender Sofware. It’s longer to build a project, but final result is really MUCH better, with so few faces compared to what Pix4d generates.
Only one mesh for SO MANY faces is not good : a good project should have as many meshes as objects ( IE 1 for a door, 1 for a tree, etc)
A simple 3D wooden door only needs 8 points and you get hundreds of points / faces with pix4d. Mapping adds details !
I’ll have a look in one year or two to your product : I’m sure it will improve.
Right now, you are overpriced considering quality results. Of course,this is only my opinion.
Didier from France.