I have been building some benchmarks lately to determine where and if performance scale is relative to pure clockspeed vs cores.
My experience so far is showing that dedicated workstation components are yiedling minimal gains over consumer grade hardware. I.E. XEON vs i7 or QUADRO vs GTX.
This is my current build and I am seeing some decent render times through each step.
CPU: i7 4790k
Ram: 16gb DDR3 PC1600
HDD: 850 EVO 512 GB (OS) and 3TB 10k RPM HDD’s (Storage)
Motherboard: ASUS Sabre tooth x99
GPU: EVGA GTX 980TI superclocked
I am toying around with a couple of other component options to see if and where we can optimize and possibly halve our times by enabling SLI components or dual CPU solutions. So far, my conclusions draw me to the answer being no and that dedicated single component systems far exceed the money invested.
Mind you, the overclocking per component is roughly 30% over stock speeds. However, only gives me roughly 10% extra time increase.
Has anyone come across the same datapoints or similar results?
dual CPU or SLI never increases the performance by 2 fold on intel pentium/i series (except 2011/2011v3 sockets) because of the pci-express bandwidth bottleneck. if you want to see true performance increase using SLI I recommend you to use Intel Xeon E5 V3 series, they can scale up to 2 - 4 cpu’s and can support multiple GPU’s without sacrificing the bandwidth (but of course only the cpu’s are expensive then your whole setup), but does it worth it? uh… no. I have a similar setup to yours, and I’m always against the overclocking because it reduces the life time of the system and doesn’t increase the performance as advertised. Switching to Titan series doesn’t increase the performance on your case too, because they have almost the same CUDA core count as GTX980Ti.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems.
They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences,
logging in, or filling in forms. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.
They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site.
All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous.
If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partner (Google).
They may be used by Google to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites.
They do not directly store personal information but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device.
If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.