I have run image in large scale >2000 images for a river survey. I have loaded all the images all at once with the flight plan using Pix4D capture. and DJI Phantom 4 advance. All the elevation I set up to 80 meters height. after the processing I have some sections jumped with some of the blue and green dots are not in the same position. is there any alternatives to bring back blue and green dots together into its “correct” position? how would I solve this?
That looks like a very interesting project! My initial suggestion would be to set the Internal Parameter Optimization to AllPrior (Processing Options > 1. Initial Processing > Calibration > Camera Optimisation > Internal Parameter Optimization) and re-run initial processing.
We have noticed this issue in the past with perfectly nadir flights and flat terrains. The AllPrior option relies more on the initial camera positions (blue dots) during optimization and hence it would set the computed positions (green dots) to where they should be i.e. the blue dots.
Hope this helps. We would be keen to know if this fixes your issue.
Hello, as far as the model is aligned with the GCPs, most probably, there is no reason to worry.
Most probably, your images’ geolocation has a vertical error that is fixed adding the GCPs.
Another possible cause of the shift is that the vertical coordinate system is not set correctly in Pix4Dmapper. What is the images’ and GCPs’ vertical coordinate system?
From the quality report, it seems that the vertical coordinate system both for the images and the GCPs is the EGM96 Geoid. Do you confirm that this is the case in reality?
Dear Christina, thank you for your response and help.
The GCPs coordinate system is EPSG:28992 RD- NEW Netherlands, also I sit the coordinates of the images as default WGS 84 (EGM 96 Geoid), however, the images are not geolocated so I added the GCPs manually with well-measured and accurate x,y and z.
I’ve tried different coordinates but still the same error, and also I continued the process till the end I could not see goo result.
Hello,
Thank you for sending the additional information.
Your images are geolocated (you can see if from the quality report, the rayCloud and the properties of the images).
Unfortunately, I do know know whether you need to select the EGM 96, the EGM 2008, another geoid or an ellipsoid for your images and your GCPs. This information needs to come from you. You need to “tell” Pix4Dmapper what is the geoid or ellipsoid of your the images and GCPs.
If the information about the coordinate system is not inserted correctly in Pix4Dmapper, you may see this vertical shift. However, as I mentioned in my first email, when the model is ajusted well to the GCPs, you most probably do not need to worry.
I continued the process till the end I could not see goo result.
Thank you for your quick response I appreciate it, the coordinates for the GCPs are EPSG:28992 RD- NEW Netherlands, I’ve tried EGM 96, EGM 84 and EGM 2008 as well but I got the same vertical shifts with different values also the finial result and output like the orthomosaic there was some distortion as you can see in the screenshot
I’m trying to see where is the source of the error to handle it somehow but I can not find it out.
with regard to " I continued the process till the end I could not see goo result." I meant that I’ve done the 3 steps 1-initial process, 2- point cloud and mesh, 3- DSM.
but nothing changed. still the same error in all the steps.
The important thing is that teh GCPs are defined correctly and the model alligns with the GCPs.
The biggest distortions seem to happen at the borders of your project, something expected as the image overlap is lower. The trees are also expected to give some noise:
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems.
They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences,
logging in, or filling in forms. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.
They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site.
All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous.
If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partner (Google).
They may be used by Google to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites.
They do not directly store personal information but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device.
If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.