I am fairly new to the UAV mapping world, I’ve been doing manned aerial surveys for the past 3 years with digital, film, and lidar sensors, though they are similar, there are definitely differences.
We’ve been mapping fairly square and rectangular parcels with a phantom 3 with varying degrees of success.
We have a corridor project of a 4 mile long winding road that has a lot of terrain relief. We need to map the road and 25 feet from centerline on both sides.We’re flying this with a phantom 3
How many ground control points and where would be optimal locations to place them? I’ve read the more the better and staggering them is ok but pairing the GCPs in the corridor is best. We are hoping for 2-3 inch accuracy. See attached image for the corridor. Right now I am up to 27 GCPs staggering them on either side of the road and 51 GCP total if I want to have areas that have GCP in pairs. It seems like this could be overkill but I don’t know.
I’ve flown all of Willard Bay dike three times. 14 miles each way. I staggered the targets every 500’, flew 1000’ each way, there and back with a very high overlap and continued bunny hopping my targets. I had no problem doing it this way. The only down fall is it was very time consuming. I could do around 6.5 miles in a ten hour day.
Pix4D got back to me this morning with this question and they recommended a minimum of 3 GCPs per flight. I have estimated 9 flights and with 3 GCP per flight, we’d need 27 at minimum. That’s exactly what we initially planned for but it seemed like overkill, but Pix4D confirmed that this is what would be required for this type of flight.
We are planning to survey 300 meters wide to 85 km long corridor. The survey is requested for a detailed design of a future road.
The terrain is mostly flat. We are targeted to GSD of 4cm accuracy to furnish 1:500 scale map as a final deliverable.
We plan to use fixed wing with 85% frontal and 65% side overlap. Each flight will cover 90 Ha (3000m x 300m) and we plan to have 6 GCPs per flight always leaving 2 of the GCPs untouched for the overlapping next flight. My only worry is the number of GCPs? Are 6 GCPs enough?
What is in your opinion the main reason for the Photogrammetry Survey to fail producing an accurate DSM and DTM?
The terrain is mostly flat. I plan to have 85% to 65% frontal and side overlap respectively at 100 m altitude. Calculated GSD is below 4cm. 6 GCPs per 3000 m length using 2 same GCPs for adjacent sections plus dozens of MTPs to insure good reproduction.
Pix4D can obviously produce an accurate reconstruction and it’s a wonderful tool. My comments were geared toward your deliverable being used for Final Roadway Design.
I actually counted on Pix4D to perform the project with limited budget and time.
However you suggest that Photogrammetry Technology is not yet capable of producing satisfactory deliverable for Detailed Road Design without spending as much time as a Strip Topo with RTK GPS, which is frustrating.
Is LIDAR the only option to have the “ground truth”?
Generally, the expected accuracy of a correctly reconstructed project is:
1-2 GSD horizontally (X,Y coordinates).
1-3 GSD vertically (Z coordinate).
Your planned 4cm GSD = 4cm to 12cm Vertical Accuracy (10 to 30 inches).
Does 12 cm Accuracy fit within your Scope of Work ? If it doesn’t, then you need to decrease your flight altitude.
If you decide to fly this project, you can consider using Pix4dTagger for automatic target recognition. It saves a lot of work. Add many extra targets to be used for Manual Check Points ( essentially a GCP that’s not used in the model reconstruction). If you can accept the implied accuracy after comparing the Manual Check Point’s computed positions, re-run the model while using the Manual Check Point Targets as additional GCP’s.
Even a LiDaR survey requires verification.
1 Like
We - and our partners - use cookies to deliver our services. By using our website, you agree to the use of cookies as described in our
Cookie Policy
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems.
They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences,
logging in, or filling in forms. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.
They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site.
All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous.
If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partner (Google).
They may be used by Google to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites.
They do not directly store personal information but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device.
If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.