I was testing the example projects from pix4dmapper, especifically the Quarry one, but I got high erros in my absolute geolocation. Why is my absolute RMS error so high even though I added GCPs?
Did I mark them wrong? In order to check for accuracy I should check the RMS error in the absolute geolocation section, correct?
As far as I can see there is nothing wrong with the result.
The biggest Error X/Y[m] for the Ground Control Points is less than 23mm. Just fine.
Error Z[m] of 129mm is not outrageous either.
The Geolocation Bias -0.331006(X) 0.588261(Y) 0.072632(Z) is just a shift, a translation between initial and computed image position in the output coordinate system.
Hi Renato,
Mapper will calculate the errors to the GCPs. These are not approximations but very reliable numbers. As for the NTRIP, these will correct relative to the closes basestation. Typically a rover should be able to acquire a point that is 2-3cm. However, there are many factors that can impact the accuracy such as the distance to the nearest basestation (amongst others).
I did a test with a mini 2 and the results for absolute Geolocation RMS error in the final report is x=86,7 cm, y=89,6 cm and z=63,91 cm. I have attached the final report below: Galpao_mini_rapid_report.pdf (2.1 MB)
Even though the GNSS receiver on the drone may generate meters of error. Could I say those measurements have been ajusted and are reliable without GCPs on the final report above?
Second question, If I add GCPs or an RTK module with Ntrip and they show a RMS error of just a few centimeters (3-10cm) after processing, could I tell my client that this is the error if he makes any measurements in my model?
Thank you for time helping me understand the final report.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems.
They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences,
logging in, or filling in forms. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.
They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site.
All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous.
If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partner (Google).
They may be used by Google to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites.
They do not directly store personal information but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device.
If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.