# Vineyard bad ortophoto

**URL:** <https://community.pix4d.com/t/vineyard-bad-ortophoto/34557>\
**Category:** Pix4Dfields Feature Request\
**Created:** [May 28, 2026, 10:02am UTC](https://community.pix4d.com/t/vineyard-bad-ortophoto/34557 "2026-05-28T10:02:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![davide.misturini](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/9e8a1a/32.png) [@davide.misturini](https://community.pix4d.com/u/davide.misturini)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2026, 10:02am UTC](https://community.pix4d.com/t/vineyard-bad-ortophoto/34557/1 "2026-05-28T10:02:07Z")

</div>

Hi everyone,

I’ve been using a DJI Mavic 3 Multispectral for a while, and I’ve noticed this issue only when surveying vineyard fields.

As you can see in the picture, the multispectral images show some kind of glitch, bad stitching, or artifact along most of the vineyard rows. As a result, the vegetation indices also contain the same shadows/artifacts, making it difficult to understand whether it’s a real issue in the field or just an image processing problem.

What is strange is that the RGB orthophotos do not show the same problem and are processed correctly without these artifacts.

Has anyone experienced the same issue?

I also tried processing a single band only, such as the NIR band, but the glitch is still present. Sometimes it appears in different parts of the vineyard, but I can still find many of these artifacts.

Thanks

 ![Immagine 2026-05-28 093236](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/pix4d/original/2X/5/589f65a2ec0ca38957f6149171aca91a11f3f51a.jpeg)

 ![Immagine 2026-05-28 093115](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/pix4d/original/2X/e/e128bf312a4fc744183f3c275ba26fb103a04ac0.jpeg)

 ![Immagine 2026-05-28 093253](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/pix4d/original/2X/9/9d657777a27549cd3acd0ecec7b0583a6777cb7a.jpeg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Julius\_Petri](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/pix4d/user_avatar/community.pix4d.com/julius_petri/32/4592_2.png) [@Julius\_Petri](https://community.pix4d.com/u/Julius_Petri)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2026, 10:45am UTC](https://community.pix4d.com/t/vineyard-bad-ortophoto/34557/2 "2026-05-28T10:45:41Z")

</div>

Which processing mode, fast or accurate, are you using to process those data sets? Please try fast if you haven’t already.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![davide.misturini](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/9e8a1a/32.png) [@davide.misturini](https://community.pix4d.com/u/davide.misturini)\
**Post date:** [May 28, 2026, 11:37am UTC](https://community.pix4d.com/t/vineyard-bad-ortophoto/34557/3 "2026-05-28T11:37:12Z")

</div>

Ok, thanks I’ ll try and let you know

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![davide.misturini](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/9e8a1a/32.png) [@davide.misturini](https://community.pix4d.com/u/davide.misturini)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2026, 10:56am UTC](https://community.pix4d.com/t/vineyard-bad-ortophoto/34557/4 "2026-05-29T10:56:40Z")

</div>

It worked, thank you very muc