# Agisoft vs Pix4D in orthomosaic quality with sequoia at 40 m height photos

**URL:** <https://community.pix4d.com/t/agisoft-vs-pix4d-in-orthomosaic-quality-with-sequoia-at-40-m-height-photos/3104>\
**Category:** PIX4Dmapper Questions/Troubleshooting\
**Created:** [May 26, 2017, 4:57pm UTC](https://community.pix4d.com/t/agisoft-vs-pix4d-in-orthomosaic-quality-with-sequoia-at-40-m-height-photos/3104 "2017-05-26T16:57:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Luis\_Ernesto\_Roque](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/71e660/32.png) [@Luis\_Ernesto\_Roque](https://community.pix4d.com/u/Luis_Ernesto_Roque)\
**Post date:** [May 26, 2017, 4:57pm UTC](https://community.pix4d.com/t/agisoft-vs-pix4d-in-orthomosaic-quality-with-sequoia-at-40-m-height-photos/3104/1 "2017-05-26T16:57:26Z")

</div>

When processing a flight at 40 m in height with the sequoia camera with pix4d does not achieve a quality orthomosaic, while with Agisoft PhotoScan it is possible to construct a orthomosaic with good texture. Why with pix4d I do not get better results with the same photos?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cristina\_Timofte](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/pix4d/user_avatar/community.pix4d.com/cristina_timofte/32/221_2.png) [@Cristina\_Timofte](https://community.pix4d.com/u/Cristina_Timofte)\
**Post date:** [May 31, 2017, 2:20pm UTC](https://community.pix4d.com/t/agisoft-vs-pix4d-in-orthomosaic-quality-with-sequoia-at-40-m-height-photos/3104/2 "2017-05-31T14:20:10Z")

</div>

Hi Luis,

To answer your question we would need more insights of your project. Could you please seen us the quality report and the log file via our [request form](https://community.pix4d.com/hc/en-us/requests/new)? Additionally some screenshots of both orthomosaics would help us to compare the results.&nbsp;

Cheers,

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Timbang\_Deli](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/pix4d/user_avatar/community.pix4d.com/timbang_deli/32/356_2.png) [@Timbang\_Deli](https://community.pix4d.com/u/Timbang_Deli)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2017, 8:05am UTC](https://community.pix4d.com/t/agisoft-vs-pix4d-in-orthomosaic-quality-with-sequoia-at-40-m-height-photos/3104/3 "2017-06-07T08:05:33Z")

</div>

hi luis, i also have problem by using ebee drone with around 7 cm GSD. it looks like p4d result is a bit blurry rather than photoscan. then p4d support told me to fly higher for achieving at least 10 cm GSD. hope their r n d team could fix this problem soon. because in my thought, if other program can provide good result, so p4d also can achieve.